Curse

shardfenix · Jul 25, 2006, 04:16 AM // 04:16

why? so you could win 100% of the time with a cripshot ranger?
/notsigned.

However, having a team-free-for-all (4v4v4v4) might make things interesting. Sending 30 offensive builds to fight each other is as far away from "fair" as you can possibly get.

Guardian of the Light · Jul 25, 2006, 05:56 AM // 05:56

/SIGNED

ME LIKES KILLING PEOPLE.

Random and great fun!

Henchman · Jul 25, 2006, 07:58 AM // 07:58

/signed
I would like to see this, something along the lines of Soldat

Thom Bangalter · Jul 25, 2006, 08:36 AM // 08:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by shardfenix

why? so you could win 100% of the time with a cripshot ranger?
/notsigned.

Q F T

Dark Dragon · Jul 25, 2006, 08:51 AM // 08:51

nice idea, but don't think it would work
only self sustaining builds would ever win
ie Wammos

Terra Xin · Jul 25, 2006, 08:54 AM // 08:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by fiery

Mesmers own all 1 vs 1.

I just quoted that, dont take it to heart :P

I'm trying to contemplate a way for others to totally screw with this just like RA had been during last weekend... frikkin leavers...

otherwise... /signed

lacasner · Jul 25, 2006, 01:28 PM // 13:28

I think you guys are forgeting something i posted originally, that techincally teaming is ALLOWED. It would be hard, because how do u really know if u could trust the player ur teaming with u.Also, u would also have to consider builds with possible alliances.

1 on 1 builds wouldnt necessarily work either. For example, lets say that this mesmer would completely pwn people. I think this is unlikly but lets assume this for the current situation.Two players that he formally killed could then kill him, or even one could kill him.

Because the of the balance of GW, and because there is no BEST build, there isnt the problem of 1 class dominating. There is always a counter build, so be aware of who u mark as the "uber" class for each situation.

Flabber Babble · Jul 25, 2006, 09:31 PM // 21:31

I smell a R/N Touch Fest

Other than that,

/signed

Blue man · Jul 26, 2006, 02:24 AM // 02:24

Hey lacasner (btw i thought u gave up that name with u know what)

. Anyways i love the concept and i think with a little tweaking this could really work. 1 thing though, when u win i think that u should get fame, just like in HoH cuz with the 4vs4vs4 idea its almost the same (please noone flame me for that last statement, just my opinion). Other than that i love it and would definetely like to take part in one.
/signed
-blue man of element

PS: any coments on my idea are welcome, plus im sure lacasner would be happy with suggestions on what happens at the end.

anonymous · Jul 26, 2006, 06:51 AM // 06:51

mantra or persistance + crippling anguish + conjure phantasm + kiting = a stalemate or win vs anyone without hex removal which seems non existant in random forms of pvp where anyone can join.

nugzta · Jul 26, 2006, 08:24 AM // 08:24

Might as well /sign

theres nothing new in pvp, so add individual FFA and team FFA

Align · Jul 26, 2006, 08:28 AM // 08:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by anonymous

mantra or persistance + crippling anguish + conjure phantasm + kiting = a stalemate or win vs anyone without hex removal

Perhaps they should lose to you then?
It's not like people complain about taking too much damage and being unable to heal it because they didn't bring a heal.

Rusty Deth · Jul 26, 2006, 12:41 PM // 12:41

I'm signing this sucker /SIGNED

My biggest complaint in PvP is the people I'm teamed with. I hate people who complain more than those who gloat on the other team.

Well actually they both suck. I just hate sore losers more.

A free for all would be great cause I can deal with ungraceful winners, but sore losers...its just a game people.

Miss Innocent · Jul 26, 2006, 12:45 PM // 12:45

Sounds a little too random to me. How many people do I have to stand back from? And I'm not thrilled by the bonus to people who avoid combat as long as possible (just don't die, right?).

Besides, DP in that would be insanely unfair.

Cid · Jul 26, 2006, 01:19 PM // 13:19

Wouldnt need Dp in a FFA... When you die your out... Surely

And mesmers with their low armour may be targeted early...

Touchers would be enemy number 1....

I really like this idea

/signed

Blue man · Jul 26, 2006, 10:36 PM // 22:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miss Innocent

Besides, DP in that would be insanely unfair.

I AGREE!
dp is so unfair for this, and like cid said when u die ur out, i agree also

Noone has yet commented on my fame idea when u win. Maybe if u come in first u get like 5 fame second is 3 fame third is 1 fame.

Also I think the map should be big yes not like a normal arena, but i think it should be like a large stadium, just a big circle or oval so there is nowhere to hide :P (all u cowards out there). This way people can attack anyone at any time. So in the end the winner would definetely win, no questions asked.

Also maybe this should be an observable match like HoH, since, if my idea works, u would get fame for winning. I'm sure there would be lots of people wanting to watch 30 lvl 20s kill each other. I know i would.

Wish i could sign twice,
Blue man

PS: I think we should start asking for a sticky and make this a real petition.

gamecube187 · Jul 27, 2006, 05:10 AM // 05:10

/signed

This sounds cool, but I think most would be a warrior..or a mm and stand back untill there are corpses and no one is around (if they can find a spot with corpses and no one just happening to be around

).

Hmmmmm...Hero vs Hero in nightfall sorta sounds like that...but then again thats just a name. It could be anything...

Rikimaru · Jul 27, 2006, 05:22 AM // 05:22

While this does sound really fun, it also seems easily exploited to me.
Here's an example: A W/R boosts the hell out of his health with Endure Pain, and possible Defy Pain if they want to fight. He then places Edge of Extinction, and watches as everyone else dies from fighting eachother. The warrior could hide the spirit in a corner or something too.
Not only that, but MMs would have a pretty sick advantage.

/signed as long as they balance it somehow. Ban ranger spirit use?

lacasner · Jul 27, 2006, 03:35 PM // 15:35

MM's would suck because there would be no corpses.Unless
u think that once u die ur corpse just stayes on the ground is
a good idea.

MysticoN · Jul 27, 2006, 04:02 PM // 16:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by lacasner

MM's would suck because there would be no corpses.Unless
u think that once u die ur corpse just stayes on the ground is
a good idea.

Lol mm could just run around waiting for corpses , but anyway .. I think this is a great idea , something Guildwars needs. The rewards could be like new type of items just for that arena .. which would encourage people to play there ... also I think it would be awsome with different settings like :

- survivor/last man standing - where the last man standing wins

- Killerinstinct - The one with most kills wins

- Assassin - you get a random person which you are going to kill , after each kill you get a new one

- Virus - arena where 1 enemy spawn with a virus and the objective is to run away from virus .. if you get caught you have virus yourself , last man standing.

/signed x100000000 times